A Century of Forests at Stake: Why the US Forest Service Needs Us Now

Misty pine forest with a path winding through tall evergreens at sunrise
Misty pine forest with a path winding through tall evergreens at sunrise
Photo: Alex Varela / Unsplash

Thirty-five thousand employees manage 193 million acres of national forest and grassland in the United States — an area larger than Texas and California combined. That ratio was already strained. A wave of layoffs, hiring freezes, and budget reductions in 2025 has thinned it further, and the consequences are showing up on trails, in watersheds, and in how the country gets ready for fire season.

The US Forest Service was founded in 1905 with a specific charge that still hangs on the walls of ranger stations. Understanding what the agency was built to do — and what it's losing — is the clearest way to see what's actually at stake for anyone who hikes, fishes, hunts, camps, or drinks water from a forested watershed.

A Promise Made in 1905

The Forest Service was created inside the US Department of Agriculture on February 1, 1905. That same day, a letter went out to the agency's first chief, Gifford Pinchot, laying out the rule the service would live by: "Where conflicting interests must be reconciled, the question shall always be answered from the standpoint of the greatest good of the greatest number in the long run."

Pinchot added the phrase "in the long run" himself. He wanted it written in because forests are a long-run asset — trees take decades to mature, watersheds heal on generational timelines, and a fire season's work echoes for years after. The mission was never about locking land away. It was about managing it carefully enough that the next generation of ranchers, loggers, hikers, hunters, and neighbors downstream would inherit it intact.

By 1910, the agency had grown from 60 forest reserves on 56 million acres to 150 national forests covering 193 million acres. That footprint is essentially the one the Forest Service still manages today.

What the Forest Service Actually Does

Most people picture rangers in wide-brimmed hats. The work is much wider than that. The agency builds and maintains tens of thousands of miles of trail, fights and prevents wildfire, runs forestry research stations, manages grazing and timber contracts, protects wildlife habitat, staffs campgrounds and visitor centers, and — the piece most people underestimate — keeps the water clean.

National forests and grasslands are the largest source of fresh water in the country under a single manager, with about 20 percent of US freshwater originating from those 193 million acres. Some 180 million people in more than 68,000 communities rely on these forested lands to capture and filter their drinking water. Major cities including Los Angeles, Portland, Denver, and Atlanta draw significant portions of their municipal supply from national forests. When the people who maintain those watersheds are gone, the water is what changes first — slowly enough that most of us won't notice until we have to.

Rocky stream flowing through a mossy forest in a Wyoming national forest
Photo: Alex Moliski / Unsplash — Dubois, Wyoming

A Year of Steep Cuts

In February 2025, 3,400 Forest Service employees were terminated in a single round of workforce reductions. The eliminated roles included wildfire mitigation specialists, range and timber managers, habitat conservation staff, and outdoor recreation employees — the people who run campgrounds, staff visitor centers, and manage the permits that keep use of the land orderly.

That round landed on a workforce already stretched thin. A letter from five members of Congress noted that the agency's workforce is nearly 30% smaller than it was three decades ago, even as the US population has grown by more than 100 million and visitation to national forests has climbed steeply. Buyouts, deferred resignations, and a freeze on most non-fire seasonal hiring compounded the effect through the rest of the year.

What It Means for the Lands We Love

Some of the effects are already documented. A Forest Service internal report found that the miles of trail maintained dropped 22% in 2025 — the lowest figure in 15 years. Some ranger districts lost 100% of their trail staff. Bridges aren't being cleared. Tread repair is stacking up. Volunteers are picking up what they can, but much of the skilled work — stonemasonry, rigging, blasting, blowdown removal on wilderness trails — requires trained people the agency no longer has on the payroll.

Trails are the visible piece. Less visible: seasonal firefighters asked to work more hours to cover gaps, because the agency didn't hire most non-fire seasonal staff this year. Research programs facing steep proposed cuts. Timber sales slower to process. Grazing and recreation permits backing up. Ranger districts responsible for larger territory with fewer eyes on it.

The lands themselves haven't changed. The staffing around them has. That's the quiet danger of dismantling a stewardship agency: the forest doesn't fall down the day the people leave. It deteriorates slowly, across seasons — a blocked trail here, a delayed prescribed burn there, a downstream treatment plant taking on more sediment than it was designed for. By the time the damage is obvious, catching back up takes decades.

Hiker walking alone along a misty redwood forest trail at dawn
Photo: Zetong Li / Unsplash — Redwood National Park, California

What You Can Do

Four things move the needle, and none of them require a policy background:

  • Tell your members of Congress. Outdoor Alliance runs a direct tool to message lawmakers about Forest Service and public-lands staffing. It takes two minutes and routes based on your zip code.
  • Support the agency's official nonprofit partner. The National Forest Foundation was chartered by Congress in 1992 to work alongside the Forest Service. When the agency can't afford seasonal labor, the foundation funds tree planting, trail crews, and watershed restoration projects directly on the ground.
  • Volunteer with a local Friends-of-the-Forest group. Most national forests have one. These are the groups running trail days, pulling invasive plants, and staffing visitor centers when staff counts drop — hands on the land, not just names on a list.
  • Speak up during public comment. Forest plans, budget proposals, and land-use changes are open to public comment. Brief, specific comments from people who use the land carry more weight than most people realize, and the comment windows close quickly.

The Forest Service will outlast this period either way. The question is what shape it's in on the other side — how many people are left to do the work, how many trails are still walkable, and how clean the water stays. "In the long run" was the phrase Pinchot insisted on. It still applies.

Sources

  1. "The Greatest Good: Pinchot Facts." USDA Forest Service. Accessed April 2026.
  2. "Water Facts." USDA Forest Service. Accessed April 2026.
  3. "Bennet, Hickenlooper, Neguse, Pettersen, Crow Urge USDA Secretary to Reinstate 3,400 Forest Service Employees Fired in Mass Layoffs." Office of U.S. Senator Michael Bennet. February 14, 2025.
  4. "Report: Forest Service Trails Suffer from Lack of Maintenance, 15-Year Low." Washington Trails Association. 2025.
  5. Outdoor Alliance — Take Action. Outdoor Alliance. Accessed April 2026.
  6. National Forest Foundation. National Forest Foundation. Accessed April 2026.
Back to blog